Michigan Technological University
How are landowners in Michigan currently managing trees on their land, and what does this mean for forest re-growth? Answering questions like these is critical for understanding how much forest-based biomass may be available to use as biofuel within the state of Michigan. Management practices on state-owned forest land may be different from practices in privately owned corporate forests or family forests. This study aims to understand current forest management practices under each of these ownership types and how this might affect forest biomass availability in the state. Ultimately, this will help to determine what practices might contribute to a sustainable supply of feedstock bioenergy facilities in Michigan, now and into the future.
To compare current forestry practices across different land ownerships in Michigan, several study sites were located in forests under three different ownerships. Sites are either in State Forests managed by the Department of Natural Resources and Environment (DNRE), on privately owned family forest land, or corporately owned forest land. This study includes approximately 100 forest stands in Michigan that are at least 20 acres in size and have undergone a harvest within the last 6 years. All of the sites are in northern hardwood forests, which are composed of sugar maple, hemlock, white ash, yellow birch and several other species.
In this study, the process for determining available biomass involves a series of steps. First, it’s necessary to understand the current forest conditions for each site, including how much biomass is there and what type of harvest practices are taking place. Next, researchers are determining how much biomass was removed in the latest harvest by looking at data from before that harvest. Using these measurements from the past and present, they can predict how much biomass may be available in the future by looking at projected tree growth. Finally, they can see if there are differences in these measurements between forests under different ownership types.
Final Project Report: